Flang drivers¶
There are two main drivers in Flang:
the compiler driver,
flang-new
the frontend driver,
flang-new -fc1
NOTE: The diagrams in this document refer to
flang
as opposed toflang-new
. Eventually,flang-new
will be renamed asflang
and the diagrams reflect the final design that we are still working towards.
The compiler driver will allow you to control all compilation phases (e.g.
preprocessing, semantic checks, code-generation, code-optimisation, lowering
and linking). For frontend specific tasks, the compiler driver creates a
Fortran compilation job and delegates it to flang-new -fc1
, the frontend
driver. For linking, it creates a linker job and calls an external linker (e.g.
LLVM’s lld
). It can also call other tools such as
external assemblers (e.g. as
). In
Clang, the compiler driver can also link the generated binaries with LLVM’s
static analysis/sanitizer libraries (e.g.
MemorySanitizer). This is
not yet available in Flang, but will be relatively easy to support once such
libraries become available. Flang’s compiler driver is intended for Flang’s
end-users - its interface needs to remain stable. Otherwise, Flang’s users will
have to adjust their build scripts every time a compiler flag is changed.
Flang’s compiler driver and the tools that it runs |
The frontend driver glues together and drives all of the Flang’s frontend
libraries. As such, it provides an easy-to-use and intuitive interface to the
frontend. It uses MLIR and LLVM for code-generation and can be viewed as a
driver for Flang, LLVM and MLIR libraries. Contrary to the compiler driver, it
is not capable of calling any external tools (including linkers). It is aware
of all the frontend internals that are “hidden” from the compiler driver. It
accepts many frontend-specific options not available in flang-new
and as such
it provides a finer control over the frontend. Note that this tool is mostly
intended for Flang developers. In particular, there are no guarantees about the
stability of its interface and compiler developers can use it to experiment
with new flags.
Flang's frontend driver and the libraries that it drives |
Note that similarly to -Xclang
in clang
, you can use -Xflang
to forward a
frontend specific flag from the compiler directly to the frontend driver,
e.g.:
flang-new -Xflang -fdebug-dump-parse-tree input.f95
In the invocation above, -fdebug-dump-parse-tree
is forwarded to flang-new -fc1
. Without the forwarding flag, -Xflang
, you would see the following
warning:
flang-new: warning: argument unused during compilation:
As -fdebug-dump-parse-tree
is only supported by flang-new -fc1
, flang-new
will ignore it when used without Xflang
.
Why Do We Need Two Drivers?¶
As hinted above, flang-new
and flang-new -fc1
are two separate tools. The
fact that these tools are accessed through one binary, flang-new
, is just an
implementation detail. Each tool has a separate list of options, albeit defined
in the same file: clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
.
The separation helps us split various tasks and allows us to implement more
specialised tools. In particular, flang-new
is not aware of various
compilation phases within the frontend (e.g. scanning, parsing or semantic
checks). It does not have to be. Conversely, the frontend driver, flang-new -fc1
, needs not to be concerned with linkers or other external tools like
assemblers. Nor does it need to know where to look for various systems
libraries, which is usually OS and platform specific.
One helpful way of differentiating these tools is to keep in mind that:
the compiler driver is an end-user tool
frontend driver is a compiler developer tool with many additional options,
Also, Since the compiler driver can call external tools, e.g. linkers, it can
be used to generate executables. The frontend driver cannot call external
tools and hence can only generate object files. A similar model is
implemented in Clang (clang
vs clang -cc1
vs clang -cc1as
), which is
based on the architecture of
GCC.
In fact, Flang needs to adhere to this model in order to be able to re-use
Clang’s driver library. If you are more familiar with the architecture of
GFortran
than Clang, then flang-new
corresponds to gfortran
and flang-new -fc1
to
f951
.
Compiler Driver¶
The main entry point for Flang’s compiler driver is implemented in
flang/tools/flang-driver/driver.cpp
. Flang’s compiler driver is implemented
in terms of Clang’s driver library, clangDriver
. This approach allows us to:
benefit from Clang’s support for various targets, platforms and operating systems
leverage Clang’s ability to drive various backends available in LLVM, as well as linkers and assemblers. One implication of this dependency on Clang is that all of Flang’s compiler options are defined alongside Clang’s options in
clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
. For options that are common for both Flang and Clang, the corresponding definitions are shared.
Internally, a clangDriver
based compiler driver works by creating actions
that correspond to various compilation phases, e.g. PreprocessJobClass
,
CompileJobClass
, BackendJobClass
or LinkJobClass
from the
clang::driver::Action::ActionClass
enum. There are also other, more
specialised actions, e.g. MigrateJobClass
or InputClass
, that do not map
directly to common compilation steps. The actions to run are determined from
the supplied compiler flags, e.g.
-E
forPreprocessJobClass
,-c
forCompileJobClass
.
In most cases, the driver creates a chain of actions/jobs/phases where the
output from one action is the input for the subsequent one. You can use the
-ccc-print-phases
flag to see the sequence of actions that the driver will
create for your compiler invocation:
flang-new -ccc-print-phases -E file.f
+- 0: input, "file.f", f95-cpp-input
1: preprocessor, {0}, f95
As you can see, for -E
the driver creates only two jobs and stops immediately
after preprocessing. The first job simply prepares the input. For -c
, the
pipeline of the created jobs is more complex:
flang-new -ccc-print-phases -c file.f
+- 0: input, "file.f", f95-cpp-input
+- 1: preprocessor, {0}, f95
+- 2: compiler, {1}, ir
+- 3: backend, {2}, assembler
4: assembler, {3}, object
Note that currently Flang does not support code-generation and flang-new
will
fail during the second step above with the following error:
error: code-generation is not available yet
The other phases are printed nonetheless when using -ccc-print-phases
, as
that reflects what clangDriver
, the library, will try to create and run.
For actions specific to the frontend (e.g. preprocessing or code generation), a
command to call the frontend driver is generated (more specifically, an
instance of clang::driver::Command
). Every command is bound to an instance of
clang::driver::Tool
. For Flang we introduced a specialisation of this class:
clang::driver::Flang
. This class implements the logic to either translate or
forward compiler options to the frontend driver, flang-new -fc1
.
You can read more on the design of clangDriver
in Clang’s Driver Design &
Internals.
Frontend Driver¶
Flang’s frontend driver is the main interface between compiler developers and
the Flang frontend. The high-level design is similar to Clang’s frontend
driver, clang -cc1
and consists of the following classes:
CompilerInstance
, which is a helper class that encapsulates and manages various objects that are always required by the frontend (e.g.AllSources
,AllCookedSources,
Parsing,
CompilerInvocation, etc.). In most cases
CompilerInstance` owns these objects, but it also can share them with its clients when required. It also implements utility methods to construct and manipulate them.CompilerInvocation
encapsulates the configuration of the current invocation of the compiler as derived from the command-line options and the input files (in particular, file extensions). Among other things, it holds an instance ofFrontendOptions
. LikeCompilerInstance
, it owns the objects that it manages. It can share them with its clients that want to access them even after the correspondingCompilerInvocation
has been destructed.FrontendOptions
holds options that control the behaviour of the frontend, as well as e.g. the list of the input files. These options come either directly from the users (through command-line flags) or are derived from e.g. the host system configuration.FrontendAction
andFrontendActions
(the former being the base class for the latter) implement the actual actions to perform by the frontend. Usually there is one specialisation ofFrontendActions
for every compiler action flag (e.g.-E
,-fdebug-unparse
). These classes also contain various hooks that allow you to e.g. fine-tune the configuration of the frontend based on the input.
This list is not exhaustive and only covers the main classes that implement the
driver. The main entry point for the frontend driver, fc1_main
, is
implemented in flang/tools/flang-driver/driver.cpp
. It can be accessed by
invoking the compiler driver, flang-new
, with the -fc1
flag.
The frontend driver will only run one action at a time. If you specify multiple
action flags, only the last one will be taken into account. The default action
is ParseSyntaxOnlyAction
, which corresponds to -fsyntax-only
. In other
words, flang-new -fc1 <input-file>
is equivalent to flang-new -fc1 -fsyntax-only <input-file>
.
The flang-to-external-fc
script¶
The flang-to-external-fc
wrapper script for flang-new
was introduced as a
development tool and to facilitate testing. The flang-to-external-fc
wrapper
script will:
use
flang-new
to unparse the input source file (i.e. it will runflang-new -fc1 -fdebug-unparse <input-file>
), and thencall a host Fortran compiler, e.g.
gfortran
, to compile the unparsed file.
Here’s a basic breakdown of what happens inside flang-to-external-fc
when you
run flang-to-external-fc file.f90
:
flang-new -fc1 -fdebug-unparse file.f90 -o file-unparsed.f90
gfortran file-unparsed.f90
This is a simplified version for illustration purposes only. In practice,
flang-to-external-fc
adds a few more frontend options and it also supports
various other use cases (e.g. compiling C files, linking existing object
files). gfortran
is the default host compiler used by flang-to-external-fc
.
You can change it by setting the FLANG_FC
environment variable.
Adding new Compiler Options¶
Adding a new compiler option in Flang consists of two steps:
define the new option in a dedicated TableGen file,
parse and implement the option in the relevant drivers that support it.
Option Definition¶
All of Flang’s compiler and frontend driver options are defined in
clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
in Clang. When adding a new option to
Flang, you will either:
extend the existing definition for an option that is already available in one of Clang’s drivers (e.g.
clang
), but not yet available in Flang, oradd a completely new definition if the option that you are adding has not been defined yet.
There are many predefined TableGen classes and records that you can use to fine tune your new option. The list of available configurations can be overwhelming at times. Sometimes the easiest approach is to find an existing option that has similar semantics to your new option and start by copying that.
For every new option, you will also have to define the visibility of the new
option. This is controlled through the Flags
field. You can use the following
Flang specific option flags to control this:
FlangOption
- this option will be available in theflang-new
compiler driver,FC1Option
- this option will be available in theflang-new -fc1
frontend driver,FlangOnlyOption
- this option will not be visible in Clang drivers.
Please make sure that options that you add are only visible in drivers that can
support it. For example, options that only make sense for Fortran input files
(e.g. -ffree-form
) should not be visible in Clang and be marked as
FlangOnlyOption
.
When deciding what OptionGroup
to use when defining a new option in the
Options.td
file, many new options fall into one of the following two
categories:
Action_Group
- options that define an action to run (e.g.-fsyntax-only
,-E
)f_Group
- target independent compiler flags (e.g.-ffixed-form
,-fopenmp
) There are also other groups and occasionally you will use them instead of the groups listed above.
Option Implementation¶
First, every option needs to be parsed. Flang compiler options are parsed in two different places, depending on which driver they belong to:
frontend driver:
flang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
,compiler driver:
clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Flang.cpp
.
The parsing will depend on the semantics encoded in the TableGen definition.
When adding a compiler driver option (i.e. an option that contains
FlangOption
among its Flags
) that you also intend to be understood by the
frontend, make sure that it is either forwarded to flang-new -fc1
or translated
into some other option that is accepted by the frontend driver. In the case of
options that contain both FlangOption
and FC1Option
among its flags, we
usually just forward from flang-new
to flang-new -fc1
. This is then tested in
flang/test/Driver/frontend-forward.F90
.
What follows is usually very dependant on the meaning of the corresponding
option. In general, regular compiler flags (e.g. -ffree-form
) are mapped to
some state within the driver. A lot of this state is stored within an instance
of FrontendOptions
, but there are other more specialised classes too. Action
flags (e.g. -fsyntax-only
) are usually more complex overall, but also more
structured in terms of the implementation.
Action Options¶
For options that correspond to an action (i.e. marked as Action_Group
), you
will have to define a dedicated instance of FrontendActions
in
flang/include/flang/Frontend/FrontendOptions.h
. For example, for
-fsyntax-only
we defined:
class ParseSyntaxOnlyAction : public PrescanAndSemaAction {
void ExecuteAction() override;
};
Command line options are mapped to frontend actions through the
Fortran::frontend::ActionKind
enum. For every new action option that you
add, you will have to add a dedicated entry in that enum (e.g.
ParseSyntaxOnly
for -fsyntax-only
) and a corresponding case
in
ParseFrontendArgs
function in the CompilerInvocation.cpp
file, e.g.:
case clang::driver::options::OPT_fsyntax_only:
opts.programAction = ParseSyntaxOnly;
break;
Note that this simply sets the program/frontend action within the frontend
driver. You still have make sure that the corresponding frontend action class
is instantiated when your new action option is used. The relevant switch
statement is implemented in Fortran::frontend::CreatedFrontendBaseAction
in
the ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp
file. Here’s an example for
-fsyntax-only
:
case ParseSyntaxOnly:
return std::make_unique<ParseSyntaxOnlyAction>();
At this point you should be able to trigger that frontend action that you have just added using your new frontend option.
CMake Support¶
As of #7246
(and soon to be released CMake 3.24.0), cmake
can detect flang-new
as a
supported Fortran compiler. You can configure your CMake projects to use
flang-new
as follows:
cmake -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS="-flang-experimental-exec" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER=<path/to/flang-new> <src/dir>
You should see the following in the output:
-- The Fortran compiler identification is LLVMFlang <version>
where <version>
corresponds to the LLVM Flang version. Note that while
generating executables remains experimental, you will need to inform CMake to
use the -flang-experimental-exec
flag when invoking flang-new
as in the
example above.
Testing¶
In LIT, we define two variables that you can use to invoke Flang’s drivers:
%flang
is expanded asflang-new
(i.e. the compiler driver)%flang_fc1
is expanded asflang-new -fc1
(i.e. the frontend driver)
For most regression tests for the frontend, you will want to use %flang_fc1
.
In some cases, the observable behaviour will be identical regardless of whether
%flang
or %flang_fc1
is used. However, when you are using %flang
instead
of %flang_fc1
, the compiler driver will add extra flags to the frontend
driver invocation (i.e. flang-new -fc1 -<extra-flags>
). In some cases that might
be exactly what you want to test. In fact, you can check these additional
flags by using the -###
compiler driver command line option.
Lastly, you can use ! REQUIRES: <feature>
for tests that will only work when
<feature>
is available. For example, you can use! REQUIRES: shell
to mark a
test as only available on Unix-like systems (i.e. systems that contain a Unix
shell). In practice this means that the corresponding test is skipped on
Windows.
Frontend Driver Plugins¶
Plugins are an extension to the frontend driver that make it possible to run
extra user defined frontend actions, in the form of a specialization of a
PluginParseTreeAction
. These actions are run during compilation, after
semantic checks. Similarly to Clang, Flang leverages LoadLibraryPermanently
from LLVM’s llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary
to load dynamic objects that implement
plugins. The process for using plugins includes:
Flang plugins are limited to flang-new -fc1
and are currently only available /
been tested on Linux.
Creating a Plugin¶
There are three parts required for plugins to work:
There is an example plugin located in flang/example/PrintFlangFunctionNames
that demonstrates these points by using the ParseTree
API to print out
function and subroutine names declared in the input file.
A PluginParseTreeAction
Subclass¶
This subclass will wrap everything together and represent the FrontendAction
corresponding to your plugin. It will need to inherit from
PluginParseTreeAction
(defined in flang/include/flang/FrontendActions.h
), in
order to have access to the parse tree post semantic checks, and also so that it
can be registered, e.g.
class PrintFunctionNamesAction : public PluginParseTreeAction
Implementation of ExecuteAction
¶
Like in other frontend actions, the driver looks for an ExecuteAction
function
to run, so in order for your plugin to do something, you will need to implement
the ExecuteAction
method in your plugin class. This method will contain the
implementation of what the plugin actually does, for example:
// Forward declaration
struct ParseTreeVisitor;
void ExecuteAction() override {
ParseTreeVisitor visitor;
Fortran::parser::Walk(getParsing().parseTree(), visitor);
}
In the example plugin, the ExecuteAction
method first creates an instance of
visitor
struct, before passing it together with the parse tree to the
Fortran::parser::Walk
function that will traverse the parse tree. The parse
tree will normally be generated by the frontend driver and can be retrieved in
your plugin through the getParsing()
member method. Implementation and
details of the Walk
function can be found in
flang/include/flang/Parser/parse-tree-visitor.h
.
You will have to define your own visitor
struct. It should define different
Pre
and Post
functions that take the type of a specific ParseTree
node as
an argument. When the Walk
function is traversing the parse tree, these
functions will be run before/after a node of that type is visited. Template
functions for Pre
/Post
are defined so that when a node is visited that you
have not defined a function for, it will still be able to continue. Pre
returns a bool
indicating whether to visit that node’s children or not. For
example:
struct ParseTreeVisitor {
template <typename A> bool Pre(const A&) { return true; }
template <typename A> void Post(const A&) {}
void Post(const Fortran::parser::FunctionStmt &f) {
llvm::outs() << std::get<Fortran::parser::Name>(f.t).ToString() << "\n" ;
}
}
The different types of nodes and also what each node structure contains are
defined in flang/include/flang/Parser/parse-tree.h
. In the example, there is a
Post
function, with a line that gets the Name
element from a tuple t
in
the FunctionStmt
struct and prints it. This function will be run after every
FunctionStmt
node is visited in the parse tree.
Plugin Registration¶
A plugin registry is used to store names and descriptions of a collection of
plugins. The Flang plugin registry, defined in
flang/include/flang/Frontend/FrontendPluginRegistry.h
, is an alias of
llvm::Registry
of type PluginParseTreeAction
.
The plugin will need to be registered, which will add the Plugin to the registry
and allow it to be used. The format is as follows, with print-fns
being the
plugin name that is used later to call the plugin and Print Function names
being the description:
static FrontendPluginRegistry::Add<PrintFunctionNamesAction> X(
"print-fns", "Print Function names");
Loading and Running a Plugin¶
In order to use plugins, there are 2 command line options made available to the
frontend driver, flang-new -fc1
:
-load <dsopath>
for loading the dynamic shared object of the plugin-plugin <name>
for calling the registered plugin
Invocation of the example plugin is done through:
flang-new -fc1 -load flangPrintFunctionNames.so -plugin print-fns file.f90
Both these options are parsed in flang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
and
fulfil their actions in
flang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp
The -load <dsopath>
option¶
This loads the plugin shared object library, with the path given at <dsopath>
,
using LoadLibraryPermantly
from LLVM’s llvm::sys::DynamicLibrary
, which
itself uses dlopen
. During this stage, the plugin is registered with the
registration line from the plugin, storing the name and description.
The -plugin <name>
option¶
This sets frontend::ActionKind programAction
in FrontendOptions
to
PluginAction
, through which it searches the plugin registry for the plugin
name from <name>
. If found, it returns the instantiated plugin, otherwise it
reports an error diagnostic and returns nullptr
.
Enabling In-Tree Plugins¶
For in-tree plugins, there is the CMake flag FLANG_PLUGIN_SUPPORT
, enabled by
default, that controls the exporting of executable symbols from flang-new
,
which plugins need access to. Additionally, there is the CMake flag
FLANG_BUILD_EXAMPLES
, turned off by default, that is used to control if the
example programs are built. This includes plugins that are in the
flang/example
directory and added as a sub_directory
to the
flang/examples/CMakeLists.txt
, for example, the PrintFlangFunctionNames
plugin. It is also possible to develop plugins out-of-tree.
Limitations¶
Note that the traversal API presented here is under active development and might change in the future. We expect it to evolve as support for new language features are added. This document and the examples will be updated accordingly.
The current ParseTree
structure is not suitable for modifications. The
copy constructors are not available and hence duplicating code might not be
trivial. Please take this into consideration when designing your plugin. In
particular, creating a transformation plugin will be noticeably harder than
analysis plugins that just consume (rather than edit) ParseTree
.
Lastly, if ParseTree
modifications are performed, then it might be necessary
to re-analyze expressions and modify scope or symbols. You can check
Semantics.md for more details on how ParseTree
is edited
e.g. during the semantic checks.